Skip to main content

Container Storage

When traveling, we always think of our traveling bag. How our luggage will fit in it, yet have you ever thought, How your bag will be stored or transferred.

I think data should be thought of same way. How it will be stored and how it will be retrieved. also sizing would matter, How much size data will occupy. Would it fit in one server or will we need a cluster. Many question would jump in your mind, yet storing and retrieving is the most general one.

And so we'll move to ask SQL or NoSQL, I'd go for SQL in-case of having multiple entities communicating with each other, having multiple relation between one another. Yet if what I need is a storage unit, then NoSQL would be my choice.

Have a look on the CAP theorem and how each of consistency, availability and partition tolerance will be satisfied using the DB engine you choose

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Not all Ps sting

  If someone meant to say Ps and pronounce it Bees. would this confuse you :). Ps is for the P that is the start of Properties and Practice Each application should have some properties and follow certain practices. Properties: Below are 5 properties we should try to have in our application with a small description of how to include them Scalable, Scale => Increase workload (horizontally scaling) Statless, no state should be shared among different application instances,  Concurrency, concurrent processing = Threads. Loosely coupled, decompose the system into modules, each has minimal dependencies on each other "modularization", encapsulating code that changes together "High cohesion".  API first, Interfaces, implementation can be changed without affecting other application. favor distribution of work across different teams.  Backing Services, "DB, SMTP, FTP ..." , treating them as attached resources, meaning they can easily be changed. Manageable, changi...

The post-office & the postman

If we were to talk about old messaging system where there exist post-office, postman & mailbox. each component had its own functionality that we looked for when trying to visualize how those component where to interact in a computerized version. Simple scenario: Mail is added in mail box Postman arrive pick mails from his area mailboxes and take them to the post-office. Post-office organize mails by areas. Postman takes mails related to his area "distribute it in mailboxes". A person can go to post-office and  pick his own mail "in case of failure or wishes for early delivery". Mapping in a computerized version: Scenario: Observer design pattern which can use push or pull scenario, to inform those whom are registered for an event about its occurrence. Component: Post-Office = Message-Broker Post-Office-Box = Message-Storage-Validity Mailbox = Topic/Queue Postman !!! where's the postman ? Apache kafka act as a message broker which d...

Micro-Service with mind-map

  If we were to give a definition to micro service, what will it be? A simple one is an architectural style, that functionally decomposes an application into a set of services, each service has a focused, cohesive set of responsibilities. Similar to most, it has to have some properties & practices, which we can categorize to a general ones and detailed ones “12-factors”.  Away from the 12 factor, Some general practice that be considered while decomposing a services:  Loosely coupled: minimum communication between Services. Cohesion: elements that are tightly related to each other and change together should stay together "Common Closure Principle (CCP)". Single responsibility principal (SRP): every micro-service should do one thing and do it exceptionally. When constructing an application or defining its architecture, we follow below three-step process: Identifying the system operations, functional requirement, which are the user stories and their associated user scena...